A Refleksi Tartibat Terhadap Fenomena Taraduf Dalam Bahasa Arab: Studi Kitab Fiqh Al-Lughah Wa Asrar Al-'Arabiyyah

Yusril Ihza Elyas; Faisol; Abdul Muntaqim Al Anshory

doi:10.58737/jpled.v5i1.393

Authors

Yusril Ihza Elyas Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
Faisol Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
Abdul Muntaqim Al Anshory Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58737/jpled.v5i1.393

Keywords:

Fiqh Lughah, Linguistic, Semantic, Tartibat

Abstract

Fiqh Lughah wa Asrar Al-‘Arabiyyah is one of the important works in the development of Arabic linguistics. This book has two main discussions, first is fiqh lughah which discusses the specification of the meaning of Arabic vocabulary and the second is asrar al-‘arabiyyah which discusses the linguistics of the content and rules of the Arabic language. In the first discussion, there are chapters that have several specific categories such as kulliyyat, tartibat, tafshilat, taqsimat and others. This study aims to discuss one type of meaning categorization in the book of Fiqh Lughah wa Asrar Al-‘Arabiyyah that is tartibat and its relevance to the principle of taraduf (synonymy) in Arabic. The study is limited to the categorization of tartibat which includes the condition of human feelings and expressions so that the study can focus on the reflection of tartibat in relation to the form of relativity of taraduf in Arabic. This research method uses a qualitative research approach with reference to the analysis of literature studies. The results of this study are that there are six scopes (sub-categories) of the tartibat categorization in the book of Fiqh Lughah wa Asrar Al-‘arabiyyah which show human feelings and expressions consisting of tartibat al-buka`, tartibat al-dhahak, tartibat aushaf al-bakhil, tartibat al-hubb, tartibat al-ghadhab, and tartibat al-surur. From the six scopes of data, words with close meanings were found, but each shows a different situation specification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addini, N. F., Iqbal, I. M., & Ridho, M. M. (2024). Kikir dalam Al-Qur’an (Kajian Lafadz Al-Bukhl dan Asy-Syuhh Menurut Tafsîr Fii Zhilalil Qur’an). Hamalatul Qur’an: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an, 5(2), 275–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37985/hq.v5i2.196

Al-Tsa’alaby, A. M. (2000). Fiqh Lughah wa Asror Al Arabiyyah. Al Maktabah Al Ashriyyah.

Annisa, M. N. (2022). Analisis Semiotika: Taraduf Kata Ghadab dan Ghaiza dalam Al-Qur’an. Al-Mubarak Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur’an & Tafsir, 7(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47435/al-mubarak.v7i1.991

Budiman, A., & Aziz, A. (2024). Isykaliyatu At-Taraduf antara Lafadz As-Sakinah dan At-Tuma’ninah dalam Al-Qur’an (Kajian Semantik Qur’an). Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(1), 1–12.

Hamzah, A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Dasar Natural Research Dilengkapi Contoh, Proses, dan Hasil 6 Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatif (1st ed.). Literasi Nusantara.

Hasyim, M. S. (2021). Al-Taraduf (Sinonim) dan Kaidah Penerapannya dalam Al-Qur’an. Rausyan Fikr Jurnal Studi Ilmu Ushuluddin Dan Filsafat, 17(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v17i2.778

Hazjahra, S., Linarto, L., Misnawati, Cuesdeyeni, P., & Gunawan, H. (2021). Citra Perempuan Dan Kekerasan Gender Dalam Novel 50 Riyal: Sisi Lain Tkw Indonesia Di Arab Saudi Karya Deny Wijaya. ENGGANG: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Budaya, 1(2), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.37304/enggang.v2i1.2853

Humayro, A. (2021). Taraduf dalam Al-Qur’an Pada Juz 15, 16, 17 (Analisis ’Ilm Ad-Dilalah Lafadz Al-Insan dan Basyar). Ad-Dhuha: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Budaya Islam, 2(1), 61–75. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Ad-Dhuha/article/view/12789

Ibnu Katsir, I. bin U. (2008). Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-’Adhim. Dar Thaybah.

Iskandar. (2021). Kontroversi Kaidah Taraduf dalam Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Semiotika Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 1(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v1i2.10164

Madaris, S. E. F. (2022). Derivasi Kata Menangis dan Ragam Maknanya dalam Al-Qur’an (Analisis Semantik). Uktub: Journal of Arabic Studies, 2(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32678/uktub.v2i1.6072

Mukhlis, M. H., & Hidayat, N. S. (2024). Pengertian dan Ruang Lingkup Mustaraq Al Lafzi , Ta ’ addud Al Ma`na dan Taraduf dalam Kajian Ilmu Dalalah. Journal of Pracitce Learning and Educational Development, 4(4), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.58737/jpled.v4i4.383

Mukhtar, A. (1998). Ilmu Ad-Dalalah. Ilmu al-Kutub.

Qomariah, R. N., & Nazwa, R. (2022). Taraduf (Sinonim) dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62748/tarbawi.v10i01.75

Rosyada, D. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif Untuk Ilmu Pendidikan (Murodi (ed.); 1st ed.). Kencana.

Sholehah, A. W. (2024). Taraduf dalam Al-Qur’an: Makna Sakhata, Ghaiza dan Ghadaba. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

Wardania, Nurhalisa, S., Gafur, A., & Mahmud, B. (2023). Membongkar Teori Anti-Sinonimitas Aisyah bintu Syatih’ dan Implikasinya dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. El-Maqra’ Tafsir, Hadits Dan Teologi, 3(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/elmaqra.v3i1.6280

Zed, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan (1st ed.). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.